RSS Feed for PoliticsCategory: Politics

Is Islam a Religion of Peace?

We would like to thank “Union of Americans” “Reader B3, NJ” for introducing us to Intelligence Squared U.S.  The ‘motion’ of the debate that we listened to was “Islam is a Religion of Peace”. To watch the debate you may click on…

 “Islam is a Religion of Peace”

Intelligence Squared U.S. offers Oxford-style debates live from New York City. In this format one side proposes and the other side opposes a sharply framed ‘motion’. The audience registers their pre-debate opinion. Each debater presents a 7-minute opening statement, then the floor is opened for audience questions and inter-panel challenges. The debate ends after each debater gives his or her 2-minute closing argument. The audience votes again and the results are tallied. The winner is the team that has swayed more audience members between the two votes.

Since its inception in 2006, the goals have been to provide a new forum for intelligent discussion, grounded in facts and informed by reasoned analysis; to transcend the toxically emotional and the reflexively ideological; and to encourage recognition that the opposing side has intellectually respectable views. They have presented over 35 debates on a wide range of provocative and timely topics.

The following is the results of the “Islam is a Religion of Peace” debate as reported by Chloe Coffman in the Washington Square News on October 7, 2010.

For further information on any of the 35+ debates please visit Intelligence Squared U.S. ~ Editor

Public Debate Questions Peace Within Islam

Hundreds of people poured into the Skirball Center last night to take part in a debate on one of the more controversial issues facing the country today — the growing militarism of Islam. The motion for the debate:

“Is Islam a religion of peace?”

The night, moderated by ABC News’ John Donvan, featured four panelists, two speaking for the motion and two speaking against it. In favor of the proposal were writer and advocate for Muslim American Civic Engagement, Zeba Khan and Maajid Nawaz, a former Muslim extremist who has since renounced Islamist ideology and now speaks up for Amnesty International as a “prisoner of conscience.” Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who led a campaign to reform Islam, and best-selling author and award-winning journalist Douglas Murray, opposed the argument, linking Islam directly with violence. 

Prior to the debate, the audience was polled as to what they thought about the issue, and results showed 41 percent were for the motion, 25 percent were against it and 34 percent were undecided. 

While a number of arguments were brought to the table, the dialogue was mainly rooted in questioning the original Islamic principles of violence against the doctrine of peace, both of which are dealt with in the Quran.

The main issues raised included the necessity to put the more violent passages of the Quran into historical context. 

Those speaking against the motion said absolutist believers failed in their attempts to contextualize the Quran. But Khan said extremists were simply circumnavigating the issue at hand.  “[The absolutists] are using Islam to cover for their political grievances,” he said. “Their real issue lies with Western domination.”

At the end of the debate, the opposing side concluded that while reformed Muslims do exist in the Western world, existing extremists are living by the Quran in its entirety, including the violence it contains. 

After the debate, poll results revealed a drastic change from the results at the beginning of the night — 36 percent were for the motion, 55 percent were against it and 9 percent were undecided. 

Several students voiced their opinions on the debate.  “It was an incredible experience,” CAS freshman Zack Barker said. “Originally I was for [the motion] but ultimately I changed by mind. Douglas made some excellent points and really persuaded me.” 

But LSP freshman Nidhi Bhatt said her vote fell with the minority in the end. “I thought that if the pro side had been more articulate, then they would have won more votes,” Bhatt said. 

Others, such as CAS freshman Billy Shaw, said they were still unsure of which side presented the stronger argument. “The debate was intense and it included the two most controversial issues of today: religion and politics,” Shaw said. “I am ultimately undecided because politically, the opposition is right and religiously, the proposition is right.”

The Government’s Role is…..

What do the American People feel the Government’s role is? The Washington Post, Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard University recently joined together and conducted a survey to determine the answer to that question. The result was published in the Washington Post on October 10th. You can read the entire article by clicking on ‘Beyond the Tea Party: What Americans Really Think of Government’

Are They Really Smarter?

If you ask me the Democrats might be a little smarter than the Republicans when it comes to direct mail marketing. I received a letter this morning from the Democratic National Committee. The piece was as good of a direct mail promotion as any I’ve seen in my 50+ years in the publishing and direct mail business.

It was a very official looking piece of mail. The face of the envelope read…

 /// REGISTERED DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED ///

Registered Survey Number: 19-08-03

Response Requested within 72 hours

The back of the envelope warned in large letters …

Do Not Tamper

The enclosed letter began…

“Dear Jack”

I’m not sure why they referred to me by “Jack”. My name is not “Jack”. The address on the envelope was properly addressed to me so they are aware that I am not “Jack”.

The letter went on to inform me all about the Democrats that are running for office. I now know why they are running, where they were running, and of their great need for campaign funds. I agree that they do indeed have a great need for campaign funds since they are soliciting non-Democrats for funds.

Overall, I have to give the Democratic National Committee an A+ in direct mail because of the attention-grabbing envelope, personalization attempt, clear and concise content, etc. However, they do have one major problem. They are trying to sell an inferior product. Any successful businessman will tell you that unless you have a good product, don’t bother trying to sell it.

November 2nd presents the American People with a unique opportunity. We can either re-elect the same Democratic Congress or we can elect a new Congress.

We ask all “Patriots” to give it your all to get the word out about how important this election is. Every single vote counts. In order to have a new Congress elected we must take every opportunity to get every Republican to vote on November 2nd. ~dhb

Signature Requested

Our nation is in serious need of leadership that will bring the American People together. Our nation is in serious need of leadership that will help the American People to strive for the American Dream again. Our nation is in serious need of leadership that will enable the American People to feel secure in our Homeland.

The Journal of the Patriots Patrol has received some mail regarding our recent story about General Colin Powell. These “Readers” expressed the belief that the General, if anything, is over qualified to be President of the United States, but that they would fully endorse him if did choose to announce his candidacy. As a result, we have been asked to actively promote this petition among our “Readers”.

We are asking each of our “Patriots” to copy this petition, sign it and email it to everyone on their email contact lists requesting them to sign it and to email it to everyone on their email contact lists, etc.

The petition below is in a format which will accommodate the signature and state of two individuals per line. You simply copy the text and paste it into a blank email. On the first available line, type your name and state. Next send it to everyone on your email contact lists requesting that they do the same. 

 Petition for Colin Powell Candidacy for the President of the United States 

We understand that for family reasons, Colin Powell is reluctant to be President of the United States. We believe, however, that our country’s need for leadership is so great that we need a canadate with credentials such as Colin Powell. His credentials are of such quality that it is doubtful that there is another person available who could match his credentials for the presidency. We therefore believe that if Colin Powell believes in the validity of this petition, he will consider the presidency. If he still finds that he is unable to serve as President that he will endorse a substitute candidate with the promise of serving in the Administration of the President.

Jack Jones,  ID     (example) Eliza McSwain, TX (example)
Tom Brown II, TN (example) Jill Highland, CA   (example)
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________  ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 
 _______________________ ________________________ 

Open Letter to David Jackson, USA Today

We appreciate your advising us that “Powell wonders if Obama is losing his ability to connect”. Of course, the evidence that Obama is not connecting is all over the place, but we do appreciate your sharing some of Colin Powell’s remarks with us.

However, we take exception to your description of Powell’s activities as being limited to Secretary of State for George W. Bush. We think people would like to know that Colin Powell was…….
 

  • Secretary of State, 2001-2005 (first African American appointed to that position)
  • Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1989-1993 (first African American to achieve the Office)
  • National Security Advisor, 1987-1989 (under Ronald Reagan)
  • Commander of V Corps, 1986
  • White House Fellowship, 1972-1973
  • Four-Star General in the United States Army, 1989
  • Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Army Forces Command, 1989

He has received the following awards and decorations from…..

The United States and other Nations……..

Badges

 Military medals and ribbons

  Defense Distinguished Service Medal (with 3 Oak Leaf Clusters)
  Distinguished Service Medal, Army (with Oak Leaf Cluster)
  Defense Superior Service Medal
  Legion of Merit (with Oak Leaf Cluster)
  Soldier’s Medal
  Bronze Star
  Purple Heart
  Air Medal
  Joint Service Commendation Medal
  Army Commendation Medal (with 2 Oak Leaf Clusters)
  Presidential Medal of Freedom (order of precedence, if worn)
  Presidential Citizens Medal (order of precedence, if worn)
  National Defense Service Medal (with 1 Bronze Service Star)
  Vietnam Service Medal (with 1 Silver Service Star)
  Army Service Ribbon
  Army Overseas Service Ribbon (with numeral 3)

Foreign decorations

In our opinion there are few men or women in public office who possess credentials that can match those of Colin Powell. We think its time that the American People examine the credentials of those who are running for public office. It is our opinion that Colin Powell occupies a postion that few if any that those serving in public life can match. It is therefore the opinion of the “Union of Americans” Advisors that Colin Powell is unique in the respect to the credentials that he has been awarded by the United States and the Governments of many nations.

CONCLUSION: 

The “Union of Americans” recommends to the American People that Colin Powell is unmatched in his credentials for public service and therefore is uniquely eligible to be a canidate for presidency of the the United States. Therefore, Colin Powell is the “Union of Americans” Advisorary Board choice to be a canidate for the presidency in the 2012 National Election. 

Therefore, be it resolved that the “Union of Americans” Advisory Board in session are proud to recommend to the American People Colin Powell as a canidate for the presidency in 2012. 

Be it further resolved that the “Union of Americans” Advisorary Board has reviewed the records regarding the life and service of Colin Powell and found his qualifications to exceed any and all those American Citizens who qualify as a canidate for the Presidency of the United States.

Be it further resolved that the “Union of Americans” undertake a petition recommending Colin Powell run for President in 2012. 

Be it further resolved that this petition be circulated on the internet and that copies of same be forwarded to the media and to each State Official(s) responsible for National Elections which will enable local “Colin Powell for President” Committees to take appropriate action.

Be it resolved that by the collection and distribution of the “Colin Powell for President” Committee petition will represent an unquestioned statement as to the interest and will of the American People in selecting a President in the 2012 Election. ~ dhb

Powell wonders if Obama is Losing His Ability to Connect

One of President Obama’s highest-profile supporters in the 2008 election — retired Gen. Colin Powell — wonders if Obama has lost some of his ability to connect with Americans.

“It’s not just me picking on the president,” Powell said yesterday on NBC’s Meet The Press. “It’s reflected in the polling.”

The White House would no doubt disagree, Powell said, but a number of Americans seem to believe that Obama is spending too much time on things like health care, environmental legislation, and education, and not enough on the primary issue: Jobs.

Of course, that is the topic of Obama’s CNBC town hall today at noon.

Powell, the Secretary of State for President George W. Bush, also suggested that Obama spend more time on the deficit, and deal better with the business community.

A partial transcript of Powell’s comment:

I think he has lost some of his ability to connect during the campaign. It’s not just me picking on the president, it’s reflected in the polling. Some of the anxiety and anger that you see out there, I think, comes from a belief on the part of the American people — whether it’s correct or incorrect, and the White House would say it’s incorrect — that not enough attention (is being paid to jobs) … his singular focus should be on unemployment.

Wall Street got fixed. They’re getting their bonuses back. We fixed the auto industry. It’s starting to function but people are still seeing a 9.6 percent unemployment rate. They’re losing their homes. They’re homes are under water. Mortgages can’t be paid. Short sales.

They are anxious and they are expecting more out of the president. I think he has to do more with respect to reducing the deficit and also being careful about putting more and more programs, more and more rocks into that knapsack because the American people are looking for a singular focus on the economy and unemployment.

And as part of that, he needs to focus on the business community. In my travels around the country, the business community is not that satisfied with the administration right now. So, I think the president is aware of all of this. His advisers are aware of all of this and I hope we will see him moving more vigorously in this direction.

(Posted by David Jackson, USA Today)

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/09/powell-wonders-if-obama-is-losing-his-ability-to-connect/1

Headlines Tell The Story (September 12 – 18, 2010)

 At “Union of Americans” we offer a review of some of the previous week’s significant news. This is done by listing headlines of that week. If you would like to view an entire article, simply click on that headline. 

Wall Street Journal (9/16/10) 
Primaries Stoke Turmoil 
31 Democrats Rebel on Taxes as Tea Party Gaines Pose Dilemma for GOP Leaders 

 
Wall Street Journal (9/15/2010) 
Obstacle to Deficit Cutting: A Nation on Entitlements 

Wall Street Journal (9/15/2010) 
Japan Pushes Down Yen 

Wall Street Journal (9/15/10) 
Tea Party Claims Big Win 
Upstart Candidate Beats GOP-Backed Congressman In Delaware Senate Primary 

Wall Street Journal (9/14/2010) 
Bank Rules Win Muted Praise 

Wall Street Journal (9/14/2010) 
Cuba to Cut State Workers In Tilt Toward Free Market 

Wall Street Journal (9/14/2010) 
AIG Plots End to U.S. Aid

Entitlements or Bankruptcy

The “ Union of American” Advisers came across an article in the September 15th edition of the Wall Street Journal that they felt was very significant. The article was “Obstacle to Deficit Cutting: A Nation on Entitlements”.

In July it was Greece. In August it was Spain. In September, it’s Ireland.

What do all these countries have in common? They are all Socialist Democracies, whose Electorate have voted for entitlements and Socialist Government. What is happening in each of these countries is the fact that their Socialist Governments are not able to pay for the entitlements they have given to their respective Electorates.

Following the disaster in Greece it was interesting to learn that the basic problem was that the Greek Government could not meet the necessary obligations of the nation without reducing entitlements. Believe it or not, the Greek People voted in a government that converted Greece into a ‘Nation of Entitlements’. The Grecian Crisis occurred when the Greek Government cut entitlements in an attempt to avoid national bankruptcy. That’s the first story regarding entitlements.

The second story involves Spain and the entitlements that the Spanish Government gave to the Electorate. The Euro-Community stepped in and assisted the Spanish Government.

We now have Ireland and another economic eruption that will add to the burden that the Euro-Communities have to underwrite in order to avoid a Euro-Recession. Whether the European banks can solve the credit crisis that is evolving is a serious question. Should they fail there is no doubt that the impact on the economies of the world will be affected and that a global crisis will result.

This is all happening at the same time that the Obama Administration has launched an Entitlement Program. The Obama Entitlement Program as a percentage of the Gross Domestic Product dwarfs the three current European crises. As a result it will have far greater impact on the economies of the world then has been experienced to date.

With such earth shaking events taking place it is hard for this author to understand how the United States can avoid re-recession in the months ahead. The problem the American People will face is if not stagflation, certainly inflation.

We’ve noticed various securities designed to protect the investor from inflation and we find that they are all beginning to prosper as a result of the economic trends in the United States. We suggest that each of our “Patriots” check with their own family and those about them as this writer has done. He has found that food prices are taking great leaps as well as other segments of the economy. It seems to be Obama Policy to ignore the threat of inflation as more and more money is printed to finance his Socialist Agenda.

His first step, HealthCare, has yet to take “effect” and have an “affect” on the U.S. economy. But the signs are there, if you want to believe them.

The best measure of inflation and deflation of course are the cycles of the economy that show growth of the GDP, the decline of the value of the dollar and its effect on unemployment (+/- 10%). No one has yet reported the cost of unemployment benefits to the American People, which are growing each month while the job market continues to show only modest improvement. Certainly, the numbers of people checking in for benefits continues to dwarf the numbers of people who remain unemployed.

This writer finds it difficult to shield his holdings against both inflation and possibly deflation. He was greatly disturbed by the rumors regarding the Bond Market and the lack of the Fed’s ammunition to stabilize those negative forces, which are slowly eroding the economy.

We can’t get a reduction in interest rates; they’re at -1% at this point in time. So the only the Fed can do is support the economy by purchasing bonds with newly printed money. This will eventually result in a negative impact on the U.S. economy.

With all of these issues currently affecting the U.S. economy, this author can only ask…. “In October will it be the United States?” ~ Publisher

China Explores a Frontier 2 Miles Deep

When three Chinese scientists plunged to the bottom of the South China Sea in a tiny submarine early this summer, they did more than simply plant their nation’s flag on the dark seabed.
 
The men, who descended more than two miles in a craft the size of a small truck, also signaled Beijing’s intention to take the lead in exploring remote and inaccessible parts of the ocean floor, which are rich in oil, minerals and other resources that the Chinese would like to mine. And many of those resources happen to lie in areas where
China has clashed repeatedly with its neighbors over territorial claims.
 
After the flag planting, which was done in secret but recorded
in a video, Beijing quickly turned the feat of technology into a show of bravado.
 
“It is a great achievement,” Liu Feng, director of the dives, was quoted as saying by
China Daily, an English-language newspaper, which telegraphs government positions to the outside world.
 
The global seabed is littered with what experts say is trillions of dollars’ worth of mineral nodules as well as many objects of intelligence value: undersea cables carrying diplomatic communications, lost nuclear arms, sunken submarines and hundreds of warheads left over from missile tests.
 
While a single small craft cannot reel in all these treasures, it does put China in an excellent position to go after them.
 
“They’re in it for a penny and a pound,” said Don Walsh, a pioneer of deep-ocean diving who recently visited the submersible and its makers in China. “It’s a very deliberate program.”
 
The small craft that made the trip — named Jiaolong, after a mythical sea dragon — was unveiled publicly late last month after eight years of secretive development. It is designed to go deeper than any other in the world, giving China access to 99.8 percent of the ocean floor.
 
Technically, it is a submersible. These craft differ from submarines in their small size, their need for a mother ship on the surface, and their ability to dive extraordinarily far despite the darkness and the crushing pressures. The world has only a few.
 
Jiaolong is meant to go as deep as 7,000 meters, or 4.35 miles, edging out the current global leader. Japan’s Shinkai 6500 can go as deep as 6,500 meters, outperforming craft
“all over the world,” according to its makers. Russia, France and the United States lag further behind in the game of going deep.
American experts familiar with the Chinese undersea program say it is unusual in that Beijing has little experience in the daunting field. As a result, China is moving cautiously. Jiaolong’s sea trials began quietly last year and are to continue until 2012, its dives going deeper in increments.
 
“They’re being very cautious,” Dr. Walsh said. “They respect what they don’t know and are working hard to learn.”
 
In an interview, Dr. Walsh said that the Chinese were especially interested in avoiding the embarrassment of a disaster that ends with the aquanauts’ entrapment or death. “If I’m the new kid on the block,” he said, “I’m going to make sure that I’ve got bragging rights.”
 
Still, China is already waving flags. The move resembles how Russian scientists, in the summer of 2007, plunged through the ice pack at the North Pole and planted their flag on the bottom of the ocean. Upon surfacing, the explorers declared that the feat had strengthened Moscow’s claims to nearly half the Arctic seabed.
 
Wang Weizhong, a Chinese vice minister of science and technology, said that the Jiaolong’s sea trials “marked a milestone” for China and global exploration. The recent successes of the craft, he said in late August at a news conference in Beijing, “laid a solid foundation for its practical application in resource surveys and scientific research.”
 
But at least one senior Chinese expert questioned what he called “the current propaganda.” The expert, Weicheng Cui, a professor at the
China Ship Scientific Research Center, which is building the submersible, said Thursday in an e-mail that the craft’s sea trials had steered clear of contested islands “to avoid any diplomatic issues.”
 
The flurry of publicity over the flag planting, he said, “is not so helpful for us to complete the project.”
 
China’s splash in the arcane world of submersibles comes after years of singling out major industries and technologies for rapid development. China is rushing to make supercomputers and jumbo jets. With expanding political ambitions and territorial claims in neighboring seas, it has paid special attention to oceanography and building a blue-water navy, one that operates in the deep waters of open oceans.
 
The United States once held the submersible lead. In 1960, it sent Dr. Walsh, then a Navy officer, to the ocean’s deepest spot, seven miles down. But over the decades, it lost its edge to France, Russia and, most recently, Japan.
 
China began its push in 2002. A few Westerners became aware of the guarded effort when China ordered from Russia the forging of a spherical hull about seven feet wide.
 
At the heart of any submersible lies the hollow sphere where the aquanauts work. It houses a pilot and two observers, who can peer out of tiny portholes. Typically, a dive into the abyss is an all-day affair, requiring hours to and from the bottom.
 
American experts said China went on a global shopping spree to gather sophisticated gear for its submersible. From the United States, it bought advanced lights, cameras and manipulator arms. Dr. Cui estimated that 40 percent of the craft’s equipment came from abroad.
 
China also turned to the United States for tutoring. In 2005, five Chinese trainee pilots and one scientist participated in eight dives on
Alvin, the oldest and most famous of the world’s deep-diving craft, which is run by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on Cape Cod. China “bought time on Alvin to gain experience,” according to the Deep Submergence Science Committee, a group that advises the federal government and universities on ocean exploration.
 
Though Alvin can go down only 4,500 meters, or 2.8 miles, it has made thousands of dives and discoveries, and is widely seen among experts as highly productive and well run.
 
One of the Chinese trainees was Ye Cong, now a pilot on Jiaolong during its sea trials.
 
Last year’s tests went as deep as 1,000 meters (about a half mile), and this summer’s as deep as 3,759 meters. Next year Jiaolong is to dive to 5,000 meters and in 2012 reach its maximum depth.
 
Dr. Walsh said the flag issue prompted more awkwardness than swagger among those who are building and testing the new submersible.
 
“We had a laugh about it,” he recalled of his China visit. “I said, ‘Oh, you’re copying the Russians,’ and they kind of giggled. These guys are pretty apolitical and pretty well insulated” from Beijing. “They’re just contractors doing their job.”

Headlines Tell The Story (September 5 – 11, 2010)

At “Union of Americans” we offer a review of some of the previous week’s significant news. This is done by listing headlines of that week. If you would like to view an entire article, simply click on that headline.

Wall Street Journal (9/11/2010)
Tough Bank Rules Coming

Wall Street Journal (9/11/2010)
Elite Flee Drug War in Mexico’s No. 3 City

Wall Street Journal (9/10/2010)
Karzai Divides Afghanistan In Reaching Out to Taliban

Wall Street Journal (9/09/2010)
Obama Launches Fall Fight
Frames Midterm Votes as Battle Over Economy; Republicans Fire Back Rival Proposals

Human Events (9/06/2010)
Why Can’t Obama Get Campaign Law Straight?

Human Events (9/06/2010)
Enforcing Immigration Laws Would Save Taxpayers Millions